Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lerner (environmentalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:52, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Michael Lerner (environmentalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BASIC. An internet search reveals no sources which discuss this person beyond incidental coverage. Daask (talk) 21:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails the GNG and NPROF. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  22:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Sources not adequate. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete as above. Insubstantial RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. He is a founder of a cancer treatment center called Commonweal, not the magazine with the same name, Commonweal, or for that matter, any other Commonweal that is notable. A moron in a hurry might insist he's notable due to the confusion. There's no evidence he's passing the prof test, since his fellowships are extremely common, pardon the pun. Most of his biographical information comes from self-created web sources. Much of the information in fact fails verification. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SNOW. Snowycats (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.