Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Liscio Jr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 22:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Michael Liscio Jr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He has two main roles as Clemont in Pokémon XY, and another as a lead role in Yu-Gi-Oh. He's also apparently a stage actor, having performed in renditions of Avenue Q. However, I couldn't find enough significant coverage specifically about him. Are his roles enough to establish notability, or not? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete His work in Avenue Q is promising and has gotten secondary coverage.   but I don't see any coverage for Pokemon or Yu-Gi-Oh! besides the convention announcement which is a primary:  It may be a case of WP:TOOSOON on the voice acting side. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the WP:TOOSOON. Can't find sources to show notability. Esw01407 (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete One for the future perhaps but not convincing at the moment. SephyTheThird (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete He is not notable enough for a stand alone article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I have found nothing at all close to independent substantial notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.