Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lissack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael Lissack

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a case of WP:BLP1E. Hater of Spam (talk) 04:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC) — Hater of Spam (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment, this is the nominator's second edit. Nakon  05:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Bloomberg News published a detailed account of his more recent activities on January 3, 2007. Notability in early 1990s constituted much more than a "single event". Cullen328 (talk) 08:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Appropriately sourced to NYTimes and involved in an ongoing dispute and investigations in his industry.Jonathanwallace (talk) 11:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge unless someone can come up with some thing more substantial. Mangoe (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per BLP1E - "If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate biography may be appropriate." A redirect/merge is inappropriate according to the guideline. If the event is notable, Lissack's involvement in the event in more than substantial. Coverage is also ongoing for a significant time. See chapters 15 and 16 of Giantkillers (ISBN 9780802141880, written 2005) for extensive coverage 10 years after the fact.  Jim Miller  See me 23:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thank you for your comments.  Based upon those I have done some additional research and did in fact discover many reliable sources regarding the subject of the article.  I have updated the article with the additional references, and would like to request that the AfD is removed as it is clear he is notable.  Thank you.Hater of Spam (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.