Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lohman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Michael Lohman
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of the article engaged in harassment leading to coverage in a tabloid and (unnamed) local television channels. I do not think this is enough to establish notability (see Notability (people)) especially in the light of the "People notable only for one event" section (see also WP:BLP1E).

The previous AfD ended in "no consensus", but I think that the fact that the new perspective allowed because the events have now receded a bit in the past as well as the strengthening of WP:BLP warrant a renewed discussion about the matter. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete in fact, a speedy delete as BLP. This is the sort of thing one event properly applies to. The previous afd took place in 2005, before our rules on these were properly understood. I think BLP should be applied very narrowly, only where there is not possible public interest, and this is one of those cases where it is relevant. DGG (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:BLP1E for an event of short term interest. Not-notable. No trace of RS or even blog interest found after 2005. Not much to base a balanced article on. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete also nominated as an attack page, since the subject is a WP:NPF and the page looks like a WP:COATRACK to criticize the subject. Protonk (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.