Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lombardi (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Michael Lombardi (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article about an otherwise non-notable person. There are a smattering of real sources, but they are not in any way in depth, as is usually required of sources for WP:N and WP:BIO. Given that, though there exists proof of this person's existance, there does not exist extensive, reliable, independent biographical information, the article should probably be deleted. Jayron  32  14:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not appear to meet GNG, and the sources are either very limited in usability or clearly not reliable sources for the subject of the article (which is not the company he heads). --Nuujinn (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of significant coverage as required by the notability guidelines. Most of the citations provided are about his company - none of which mention him - and the Who's Who entry does not seem enough to show notability. I must point out that various shop sites refer to this publication as being independent and I can find no mentions of people paying for an entry. --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternative account of Phantomsteve] —Preceding undated comment added 01:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete Promotional article that fails notability.Griswaldo (talk) 21:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.