Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lynch (geneticist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar ⨹   02:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Michael Lynch (geneticist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not clear that this individual would meet notability guidelines for academics or authors. NickCT (talk) 17:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  20:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Very strong keep He is a member of the US National Academy of Sciences, which clearly meets WP:PROF criterion 3. Everymorning   talk to me  20:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. His top five publications have over 1000 citations each (over 100 would be enough). He is a distinguished professor, and an academy member. So he easily passes multiple WP:PROF criteria. Incomprehensible nomination. Strongly suggest that the nominator withdraw it to avoid wasting more of our time here. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator - Per Everymorning ; NAS membership seems like clear line for WP:PROF criterion 3. NickCT (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.