Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Mandel (economist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Firstly, I have to say that the lack of rationale given in this debate is not ideal, as only the opener has really said anything at all about their arguments. Secondly, as two relists have not attracted much interest to this debate, I must close it as a no consensus. It may be brought back to AFD without prejudice, but I would hope for slightly more than "notable" and "non-notable" !votes in future. KaisaL (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Michael Mandel (economist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 04:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable economist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE. North America1000 02:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable author and journalist. Jonpatterns (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.