Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Marcotte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Michael Marcotte

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources are routine news coverage in the local news - articles are mostly about the organizations involved rather than about the subject of this biography. The "40 under 40" award is just a local event (doesn't meet the "well-known and significant award or honor" criteria at WP:BIO). There simply isn't any significant coverage in independent sources. The article was created by User:Acumen.pr (an obvious username connection to Marcotte's business) and all other content contributors to the article are single-purpose accounts indicating WP:COI or autobiography. Deli nk (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. I had been thinking about putting the AfD myself and just waiting to see if anyone jumped up to improve it first. Article seems to mostly fall under WP:PEACOCK Simonm223 (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete My BEFORE on Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find anything not already in the article, which is not enough. A local "40 Under 40" award is insufficient as a significant honor per nom. A REDIRECT to Acumen Digital is ill advised as the namespace "Michael Marcotte" should be used to redirect to Michael J. Marcotte instead, who has inherent notability under WP:NPOL. Chetsford (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - obvious PEACOCK and likely COI. Newimpartial (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Just went through the edit history and you're probably right - most of the edits on the page come from the same sockfarm and include such situations as the time they put a legal threat on the page while edit-warring. Simonm223 (talk) 16:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and above. Promotional bio of an as yet non notable subject. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.