Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Meunier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Michael Meunier
Some google hits, came second place in something. From speedy. No vote. r3m0t talk 00:28, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Happy New Year. Mostly Rainy 02:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why? FCYTravis 07:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletions.   -- Rob 01:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * weak delete. I know WP is not paper, but doesn't seem notable. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  01:37, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, sacrificial candidate in local election against a rock solid incumbent who won re-election easily. Is getting 6590 votes that notable? Can't count either - since when has 27% been "approximately 20%"? Average Earthman 01:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. non notable NeoJustin 03:36, January 1, 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. FCYTravis 07:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless there's something else to say about - comes close. WhiteNight T 07:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might have been notable during the campaign but not now. Seems more interested in promoting his missionary-type things. First deletion of the New Year. Daniel Case 07:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - IMHO, notable, but barely so.→  P . Mac Uidhir  (t)  (c)  09:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn--MONGO 11:50, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Ajwebb 22:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.