Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Milenski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Punkmorten 21:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Michael Milenski
While there does appear to be some notability here, there is also the larger issue of WP:COI (don't want to use the dreaded "V" word). If deletion is not appropriate, I recommend userfy. cholmes75 (chit chat) 22:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Keep but needs wikification and sources. I have seen worse articles out there that has some purpose.  I think it is a stretch to delete it.  Tag it for wikification and sources and see what happens.  Chris Kreider 22:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Chris, and, per Google, seems notable enough in the LA opera scene, however active that is. --Steve 23:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, — CharlotteWebb 01:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep assuming the claims are verifiable. --Dhartung | Talk 06:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I added some sources although strictly speaking the article should be made a stub—I could not find most of the information in the cited sources. Kavadi carrier 09:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As most of the article was written by Mmilenski (no other contributions), it appears to fail WP:AUTO. Caknuck 09:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per "If in doubt, don't delete." Mentioned in LA Times article, etc. Agree with probable WP:AUTO as above, but on balance feel it is outweighed by other evidence.--Ling.Nut 20:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.