Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ngoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 03:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Michael Ngoo

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Contested PROD; non-notable youth player who fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 17:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:45, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep Delete. He has apparently played once for Liverpool and three times for Port Vale, which seems to satisfy the requirement of ATHLETE, which says "Players who have appeared, and managers who have managed, in a fully-professional league (as detailed here), will generally be regarded as notable." -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have a reliable source to verify this information? The BBC match report for the Liverpool game he "apparently" played in doesn't mention him AT ALL, and he also never played for Port Vale. GiantSnowman 17:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're right, it looks like he didn't play in that game for Liverpool after all, so I've removed that claim. And there's no evidence shown that he played for Port Vale. Curiously, his Liverpool profile says "He continued to progress throughout his first year with the Reds and capped a fine term with a sublime Maradona-esque solo goal in a 3-0 win at Stoke City", yet according to the results, Liverpool didn't win 3-0 at Stoke - I wonder if that was a reserve match? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Definitely a reserve/youth game. GiantSnowman 18:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I've now checked Port Vale's official site too, and there's no mention of him in the 2009-2010 or the 2010-2011 seasons, so I've removed the Port Vale claims too. I think the myth is busted. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - While it's certainly possible that he passes WP:ATHLETE, that claim is currently unverified. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both ATH and GNG at present Zanoni (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. article created by blocked 16yr old sock who developed a histoy of creating non-notable youth footballer articles, and soon learned to add a game or two to infobox histoy to give the impression they pass WP:NSPORTS. Without a reliable verifiable source this article should go they same way as most of his others.-- Club Oranje T 11:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, as he fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per ClubOranje. -- Joaquin008 ( talk ) 11:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.