Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Otto (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Michael Otto (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him (instead of by him) in independent reliable sources. Inhouse graduate award is not major. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails SIGCOV, insufficient coverage in indpendant sources. Yet another in the plethora of articles about non-notable St Peter's College old boys. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 09:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant third-party sources. School publications and his own publications do not establish notability. LaMona (talk) 23:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.