Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Parmelee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw  talk 21:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Michael Parmelee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May work in the film business but unable to locate any sources that aren't self published or just passing mentions that confirm he was involved in a production. Detailed discussion of him or his work seems to be absent. Nthep (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - The references are either not WP:RS like YouTube or iMDB or just include his name as author of the included pictures. No in depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.--Rogerx2 (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject has not received significant critical attention. Mduvekot (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be mostly promotional for a commercial photographer. The references that seem credible (L.A. Times, NYT) are simply photo credits. Netherzone (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.