Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pitman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. withdrawn (non-admin closure) Atmoz (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Michael Pitman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references, not notible Liveintheforests (talk) 14:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:ACADEMIC. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:POINT nomination from disgruntled editor with battleground mentality, who gutted the article, stripping all sourcing and much content, at time of nomination. See also Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 15:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Article i worked on - It was me who found all the sources for this article, but due to a certain user stalking me. Il have the article and the references i put up deleted. Thank you very much. Liveintheforests (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * So you're saying this AfD was just to make a WP:POINT? --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

*Delete. Non notable, fails GNG, no third party sources. Just self-sourced self-published tripe. The author is a nobody and telling by the volume of his vanity publishing, he's strictly a legend in his own mind. Marchetti 77 (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC). — Marchetti 77 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. User has been blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep article's notability seems to have been established under WP:ACADEMIC, and it does have references, contrary to the nom's suggestion. While this is the only one that I see as not being a WP:SPS, I'm sure other sources exist, and articles shouldn't be deleted to make a WP:POINT. - SudoGhost&trade; 15:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as this is a pointy nom per this ANI thread   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 15:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * change of mind - Keep article. i have added references. Liveintheforests (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.