Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Plumb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 07:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Michael Plumb
Confirmed hoax. See message board discussion of the "hilarious wikipedia article about my friend mike" --CoolArrow, 01:14, 4 March 2006

Possible hoax. Article is about a set of phrases or sayings that have reached the point of being "folkloric" in nature. The article goes on to explain that this folklore "begin around late 2002" and provides the primary source of the folklore as a single student at Washington and Jefferson College. Delete as per WP:V unless reliable sources are provided to verify the claims of the article. --Allen3 talk 00:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete, per nom.  -- McDaddy | Talk 08:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC) This "confirmation" is unsubstantiated.
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 00:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. SailorfromNH 01:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  dbtfz talk 03:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom.  -- Vary | Talk 03:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as pure rubbish.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 06:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If would have turned up anything, I would have voted keep, but it didn't. --CrypticBacon 07:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  09:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. Grandmasterka 10:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity, unverifiable nonsense. --Ter e nce Ong 10:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverified, probable hoax unless academic sources can be cited to confirm assertions in the text.  (aeropagitica)   11:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-03-03 13:34Z 
 * Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Krashlandon (e)  21:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.