Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Reksulak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Michael Reksulak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not realistically meet any of the seven WP:ACADEMIC criteria. Is a minor academic and isn't near meeting any of the criteria at present.  White Whirlwind  咨   22:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citation counts on Google Scholar are not strong enough to make a convincing case for WP:PROF and the article does not present any other case for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL and WP:PEOPLE. I have to point out that he is not even listed as law school faculty and he is two steps below the center's dean, who in turn reports to the dean of the law school, who in turn .... Sorry. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable economics academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.