Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Repoulis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Favonian (talk) 09:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Michael Repoulis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Composer who does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Existence of works can be verified, but there is no indication that the individual or his works have received third-party coverage in WP:RS to warrant an article. I find music repositories, sites at which his sheet music can be purchased, etc., but nothing that suggests notability. Article also appears to be an autobiography; only source provided is a primary source and does not provide information about other possible sources. Kinu t/c 03:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. My web searches confirm nominator's assessment. Happy to look again if substantial secondary coverage from WP:RS sources can be found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an autobiography; reliable sources are extremely unlikely to be forthcoming. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 04:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I've already speedied this once  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, author is blocked for repeatedly installing his name as a red link, did not respond or react to advice and warnings, s. his talk and the history of (for example) List of composers by name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no evidence of coverage anywhere other than self-promotion, so he would appear to be non notable. (RT) (talk) 14:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 08:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete AUTOBIO; subject fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. These concerns were explained to the article's creator--since blocked for spamming--along with the suggestion that they construct the article in their user space first. None of this was acknowledged or heeded, so what's left is an autobiography without reliable sources. JNW (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.