Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Roby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Michael Roby

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, reason was Nonotable motivational speaker with unsourced bio. Procedural nomination. Thank you for your consideration. Tone 14:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - the PROD reason is good: promotional article, no independent references, and on a quick search I don't find enough to make me think he meets Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 14:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable, no good sources.  Graymornings (talk) 04:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: Subject has several accomplishments that don't individually rise to the level of notability. Head of the local chapter of a marginally notable national speaking organization, columnist in a marginally notable magazine, author of a non-notable book; inadequate reliable sourcing seals the deal.  Baileypalblue (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.