Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Schmidt (designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Michael Schmidt (designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I think he may be notable, but this is pure promotion, starting with the long quote in the lede paragraph.  DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've largely cleaned out the promotional puffery and sourced the Emmy nomination. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 10:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've improved the article and there's just enough coverage from various outlets to where he would pass notability guidelines. It still needs work, but it should be much better than its initial puffy state. On a side note, I'd like to warn that there are a few Schmidts out there that will give some false positives. (Our Schmidt, for example.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tokyogirl79's edits. Not very notable but enough to pass wp:GNG Neonchameleon (talk) 14:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep sources have been provided. The article now shows enough coverage to pass GNG.  Alex discussion ★ 16:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.