Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Scott Paper Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Michael_Scott_Paper_Company_(The_Office_episode). It appears that the content is all ready represented at the target article. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Michael Scott Paper Company

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Insignificant in-universe fictional company from a television show that was in a few episodes, hardly notable enough to warrant its own article. No out-of-universe info, and doubtedly will any encyclopedic out-of-universe be found to warrant its own article Ejfetters (talk) 08:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge to show article. Minor plot elements do not need their own articles. Collect (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Too minor to merge in my opinion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 11:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Michael Scott Paper Company (The Office episode) and Merge content with Michael Scott (The Office). Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 19:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Michael Scott article. I didn't realize that this company would wind up being so minor. User:Sorebearmat (T/C) 00:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with the episode(s). Nergaal (talk) 01:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. All of the content of the article except the Korean writing on the van is present in the articles related to the episodes the "company" was featured in.  There is nowhere to merge the data.  In fact, I just copied the last bit over.  ZabMilenko 07:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Michael Scott Paper Company (The Office episode). This will keep the content available in the history if need be. There doesn't seem to be a need to merge because all of this content is covered in the individual television episode articles. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( contribs )  06:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.