Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Spiegel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Michael Spiegel

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Subject of the article has posted to WP:BLPN requesting deletion due to WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE WEIGHT issues. No actual opinion expressed about AFD by nominator, procedural nom. -- Cirt (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * delete - as per subjects comments at BLPN and the low notability of the last twenty four years of his life spent as a defense attorney, . Off2riorob (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 15:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 15:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, to respect wishes of subject. The article has just been stubified pending the result of this discussion. J04n(talk page) 15:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable by a long shot, and even if he were marginally notable he's requested deletion. Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. No notability aside from long-ago participation, which is arguably a single event. Ray  Talk 03:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't quite WP:BLP1E, and if the subject had the same biography in the 2000s instead of the 1960s, there would be no question that his readily accessible media coverage would result in a keep consensus. But I'm a deletionist, so Merge/redirect to Weatherman (organization). THF (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.