Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Steinger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Michael Steinger
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a non-notable lawyer who unsuccessfully represented a client in an action against a celebrity, and failed to win a nomination to the Senate. I don't believe he meets WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The rule of law is important and he does appear to be politically/civically engaged, but given the overabundance of lawyers now, he really has to separate himself from the pack. He fails to do this. I don't see adequate in-depth coverage from reliable sources.Knox490 (talk) 03:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete defeated candidates for state legislature are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Where I live I see his commercials (and just recently I hired a lawyer like Steinger to represent me after I was struck by a car while out for my morning walk) for his law firm all the time. That said, not notable lawyer and failed politician....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment An article on this person was previously deleted after an AFD. The discussion can be found here. I nominated this article for speedy deletion and suggest both articles be SALTED if this edition is deleted again....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.