Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Sutton

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Michael_Sutton
This is a vanity page about my uncle. However, neither he nor I wrote it. I found this on accident and he had no idea as to its existence. There is also inaccurate information the article. For example, he didn't co-found those magazines. And neither is he married as the article states at the end. He isn't that well-known Chris 05:44, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Maybe a different Michael Sutton? Not related perhaps? Hamster Sandwich 06:11, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment No, there are accurate things in this article. Definitely him. --Chris 06:36, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment If neither you nor Michael Sutton himself (nor anyone else in the family) wrote it, it's not really a vanity article. Do any of the accurate things in the article establish his notability? If you could correct the inaccuracies first, then Wikipedians could better decide whether they think he's notable enough for an article. It's also possible someone has conflated two Michael Suttons, finding some things out about your uncle and other things about the other guy, and thought they were the same person. --Angr/undefined 06:41, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I won't bother with fixing the inaccuracies. I'm really not interested in doing so even if I had the correct information; it was my uncle who said the stuff was inaccurate so he's in a better position than I am to fix it. It's funny you mention the two Michael Suttons thing because that is how the whole thing started in the first place. I was demonstrating to my grandmother (she is not familiar with computers) that there are multiple Michael Suttons on the internet via Google. And we were shocked when this page showed up. I've been on Wikipedia for a while and never saw this page (well it was created last month). But yeah, all this is very strange. --Chris 08:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, if you say he's nonnotable, I'll take you're word for it. Delete. --Angr/undefined 09:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Hopefully notable in the future. ;-) --Chris 09:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete While I am sure he is a good researcher on rock music especially Pinoy music, it would appear that he is not notable enough to warrant an article. Capitalistroadster 07:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable. Hamster Sandwich 07:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 09:14, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax or mixup as per the guy's nephew. Dcarrano 12:56, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Dcarrano. Binadot 21:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Page might have been made to slander him.  Almafeta 02:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.