Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael T Cammarata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Currently an unsourced BLP. If someone wants to write a new article with reliable sources then go for it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Michael T Cammarata

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references supplied in an article about a living person. No sources supplied to indicate notability. A quick Google search did not reveal any reliable source discussing the subject. SQGibbon (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find any sources to establish notability. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango  ( contact ) 05:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've added a reference for the first section of the article, and I've added two external links.  Cammarata was only 13 years old when he first emerged as one of the early innovators in monetizing the Internet Advertising marketplace.  The article could use some cleanup work, especially with certain content that needs further verified.  I will assist further as best as I can should the article survive this afd.  SaveATreeEatAVegan 07:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The two external links you supplied appear to be press releases (the one from Red Orbit pretty clearly so and the other one seems likely) which do not go toward establishing notability. The reference you supplied does not appear to be a reliable source (from what I can tell it collects stuff from all over the Internet in order to help members learn English) and is a copy of the lead paragraph of the Wikipedia article (complete with the footnote superscript rendered as "[1]" instead of a superscript). I've removed the reference for now. SQGibbon (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 18:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.