Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tritter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep per WP:SNOW. If an article has featured article status, as this one does, it probably should not be deleted unless it has first gone through a featured article review and been demoted; otherwise, we would be deleting an article considered to be one of the best in Wikipedia. Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Michael Tritter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Michael Tritter is a minor Character who only appeared in 7 episodes of House MD. this charachter is sufficiently covered in List of House characters, and fails to be notable enough to have it's own article ... Misty Willows  talk  01:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep- For such a minor character, there's an awful lot of sourced out of universe material. Notability is certainly well established. I see no reason to delete. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As sourced in the article, the fact that the character was nominated for an Emmy doesn't hurt the case for notability either. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The actor was nominated for an Emmy, not the character. and most the references are just fansite references, You can find as much for every contestant on America's Next Top Model, many of whom have had their articles deleted. Currently, there is an AfD for Katarzyna Dolinska, who do you think is more notable Michael Tritter or Katarzyna Dolinska?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misty Willows (talk • contribs) 02:56, 12 April 2009
 * Was there an actual argument there or are you just going to say WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and expect it sway me?Umbralcorax (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, not all of the refs are great, but enough of them are solid to establish notability. Passes WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS. Besides, I find it hard to believe that a non-notable character could achieve featured article status, as this one did in January. Sarilox (talk) 03:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I see Chicago Tribune and NYT in there. (NYT is only passing mention, but Tribune is half-decent.)  And, while FA status does not guarantee notability prima facie, the fact that it got this far does send a strong message. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 04:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hunh. It was a featured article. I never even noticed that. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep This "minor character" was a major part of the final arc for the third season involving Dr. House. The sources are there, the article has been featured, and the Emmy nomination seals everything.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Not much else to say here, really.  Nate says it well above.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  05:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thought about doing a NAC, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to leave it up for a few more hours to see if any legitimate delete !votes appear. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 07:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like a recurring character to me, not a minor character. JBsupreme (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 *  SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP SPEEDY KEEP JBsupreme (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL this is a featured article nominated for deletion? When has that EVER succeeded in the history of Wikipedia?  JBsupreme (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.