Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wandmacher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Michael Wandmacher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Creator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Most contributors to the page have been blocked as sockpuppets. And prior to a me finding the article (through a sockpuppet investigation) and attempting CSD and PROD, the article was 3 sentences long and then a list of his credits (like a job resume), most of which were unsourced. With only one reference. Since then, a new user account with only one edit has added information and references, but still does not demonstrate notability. Article should be deleted. Kellymoat (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Situation update - The new user I spoke of has also been confirmed to be a sock puppet. Kellymoat (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep - I think this is a good nomination as the article at that time was in poor shape. However, some research indicates that, while the references are not strong and are scattered among non-authoritative sites, they are relatively plentiful and - I think - squeak across the notability threshold. I was in the midst of editing the article when the font size on my view of Wikipedia blew up (no other sites) and I cannot now effectively edit.  I will try to return and supplement.--Rpclod (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.