Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Winkler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Michael Winkler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established. No major independent exhibitions noted nor significant coverage in independent media. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:ARTIST #4, held in permanent collections "of several notable galleries or museums": Museum of Modern Art (extensive collection), Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, Berlin State Museums, Brooklyn Museum, Yale University special collections. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete When an artist makes books it's difficult to determine whether they're in the museum library (not in itself notable) or the collection (notable). The MOMA artist book collection is listed in their library, rather than the collection proper. Some artist books make it to the collection: for example Ruscha's 26 Gas Stations is definitely in the MOMA collection. The Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, is the best ref for notability, but I don't think it's enough..Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * How to determine MOMA library and not collection? It shows multiple locations and some of them say things like "artists file". Yale says "special collection" and not for circulation. And what about Berlin. If it is hard to tell, we should err on the side of caution and not delete a notable artist. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep Meets standard requirements. If they are collected as works of aert by major museums, the artist is notable .  DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.