Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wood (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Michael Wood (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article about a man who wrote two books and holds three patents. No clue as to what those patents are for, and none of the books seem to be notable. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication as to why holding some patents makes him a notable inventor. The books are published through iUniverse, print on demand publisher.  There's no indication that these books have received any sort of significant critical review or attention. -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 19:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Only references fail WP:RELIABLE and patents are for all intents and purposes self published.--Savonneux (talk) 04:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments. i could find only a brief mention in a blog on how to spot phony experts . not even very notorious.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to lack any real coverage.Slatersteven (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.