Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Woods (producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Michael Woods (producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:04, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. Normally, we have deleted such articles about ordinary music producers. This one is distinction of having recorded a charted song in the UK (top 100 but not top 40). So, I'm leaning keep. Can somebody rescue this one? I don't listen to that genre of music very much, and am far from an expert. Bearian (talk) 00:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. This artist is notable for producing charted recordings. He has also produced and remixed for many other artists (who are also distinct and notable) and there are a lot of pages that link to the article. Deleting the article would cause inconvenience with removing the many links to it. Lazz R (talk) 11:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.