Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 09:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Michael Zak
Delete. As I said when I prod-ded it: ''Notability of this subject is in question. Google search for "Michael Zak" brings up about 15 relevant mentions in the first 50 results''. Author of article has also been inserting somewhat inflammatory remarks about politics and the Civil War into other articles. Regardless, I can't see how this subject meets the guidelines of WP:BIO. ... disco spinster   talk  20:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO. -- Nish kid 64 20:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not WP:LAYOUT, some passages not encyclopedic. User:Yy-bo 21:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, also article is nothing but bias. Author's other edits are similarly biased. NawlinWiki 21:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and in accordance with WP:BIO. --Charlesknight 22:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It looks like someone typed up a campaign pamphlet. --Eileen R 02:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.