Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zavarella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Michael Zavarella

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Google search turns up social media hits rather than third-party information. Tone isn't a reason to delete, but removing the peacock slathering, such as "defining figure in Canadian history", might leave very little. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The one secondary source currently cited in the article doesn't mention Zavarella. All the other sources are primary. No independent sources to support notability, so he clearly fails WP:GNG. The tone issues are not, in itself, a reason to remove the article; however, they suggest that the main contributor might be a related party or otherwise creating the article with the intent of getting Zavarella's name out there. —C.Fred (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - run of the mill business person. Net worth of $9 Million is not even rich today. Bearian (talk) 02:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.