Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zielinski Co.

Michael Zielinski Co. was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

One sentence about a company that hasn't existed for 44 years. The epitome of non-notable. RickK 22:29, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * I would have speedy deleted it to be honest with you. Delete nonetheless. -- Graham  &#9786; | Talk 22:34, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I don't think it fits the narrow definition of a speedy candidate, but it is an obvious delete. Livajo |[[User talk:Livajo| &#1090;]] 22:39, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Improv 23:20, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 23:48, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Extremely notable company. Keep and expand. anthony (see warning) 19:59, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Please provide a single shred of proof of this company's notability. If you cannot do so, then you are in violation of the arbcom ruling that you refrain from trolling the VfD pages.  RickK 20:42, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete--ScottyBoy900Q &infin; 18:29, 04 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.