Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zimmer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Zimmer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Assistant professor with no evidence of any unusually high academic impact (such as highly cited papers) that would allow a pass of WP:PROF #1 at this early stage of his career. I don't think the GQ and Eagle Eye contributions are enough for WP:PROF #7, and he clearly does not pass the other criteria of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original prodder. Abductive (talk) 05:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not yet notable. DGG (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails WP:ACADEMIC and barely even makes an attempt to argue for any sort of notability. This is yet another article that was prodded and then deprodded by one of the many socks of a banned user -- should never even have gotten as far as AFD. DreamGuy (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.