Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael acquilano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g1, patent nonsense, school inside joke, see also author's contribution to article talk page, which I quote: "REEEH!" NawlinWiki 19:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Michael acquilano

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Originally listed as a speedy deletion for no claim of notability. I replaced the speedy with a PROD because I didn't feel this met the speedy threshold. Article was deprod'd by the creator. Essentially, there is nothing about this particular individual that meets WP:BIO at this time. My opinion is that the article should be deleted, but I want to afford it a community debate.Isotope23 13:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * SPEEDY DELETE - This is a joke page. Look at the author's list of other "contributions".--Ng.j 15:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Just go ahead and do it. It's really obvious that this guy's not notable and probably never will be. YechielMan 16:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.