Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael behrens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this is sufficient to close and the collections are also convincing enough (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  23:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Michael Behrens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ARTIST. Some work in public collections, but not important ones. TheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: The glass collection of the Museum Kunstpalast is one of the largest and most important in the world, and the de:Glasmuseum Immenhausen (which the article fails to mention Behrens' inclusion in) is also a notable collection. There appears to be a significant exhibition record, and coverage in at least two or three important art publications including The Burlington Magazine. The article and references need work, but I think notability is sufficient. IamNotU (talk) 18:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Passes WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG easily. Museum's collections as well as publications support strong notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The subjects meets WP:ARTIST 4(d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Mduvekot (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability guidelines and references check out. I notice that the photo of the artist was nearly deleted this week but it was ultimately decided to be kept. Prhartcom (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.