Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaela Roessner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn as WP:CREATIVE met through winning major award. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Michaela Roessner

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:CREATIVE. most of the coverage in gnews is passing mentions not indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This, from the Google News archive hits mentioned by the nominator, is an 890-word review of the subject's work in the Chicago Tribune, there's a bit of coverage on two pages of this book and there are some awards referenced here. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: Winner of the John W. Campbell Award for New Author in 1989 (voted on and presented during the Hugo Award process) and the Crawford Award from the International Association for the Fantastic in the Arts.Shsilver (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The John W. Campbell award is a major award, and Phil Bridger's find looks plenty fine, too. Jclemens (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.