Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Auder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Dr42 (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Michel Auder

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject does not meet WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV, and may be WP:SPIP Dr42 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator per discussion below. Dr42 (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I am seeing many good exhibitions: MoMA (five times), the Stedeijk Museum and he was also in the 2014 Whitney Biennial. There is at least one collection. There are lots of reviews and essays on his work.Possibly (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I suspect the Biennal would qualify him as notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - This publication has some good biographic material on his work that will be helpful for article development. Netherzone (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Additional comment to nom: would you consider withdrawing your nomination? I'm finding many reviews and magazine/journal articles online by notable authors, that I'm quite surprised that this was put up for deletion. There are so many excellent sources available! Netherzone (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree about withdrawing the nom. There clearly a lot of SIGCOV out there, as well as the museum collection and the significant shows. Possibly (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I will withdraw. Dr42 (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - This artist was very well known in the 80s and 90s - many international exhibitions and film screenings. I will see if I can find other collections and add them to the article (which needs improvement.) Netherzone (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added one collection, which with the Whitney Biennial means he meets WP:NARTIST.Possibly (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.