Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Claudet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Michel Claudet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is about a local parish president and fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. The coverage is all local and comes under WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. Newshunter12 (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable county official. All news sources are routine coverage from the local newspaper. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Surprisingly, even though the subject here is a county-level official in Louisiana, the creator was not Billy Hathorn — but that doesn't mean the principles of WP:NPOL change at all. People at this level of political office are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but must clear NPOL #2 as the subject of significant and substantive press coverage that goes beyond just the purely expected mentions of his name in the local media. Of the five media hits here, however, three just glancingly mention Claudet's name in the process of being primarily about other people, while the other two are just routine election coverage — and besides those, the only other references here at all are primary source verification of raw vote totals. This is not how you demonstrate that a county-level official is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.