Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michela Battiston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Michela Battiston

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:49, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * KEEP. World level medalist.-Binbaksa (talk) 03:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage and so it fails the GNG. There is no narrative beyond a couple of brief notes, probably derived from a statistical source. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Quoting WP:NATHLETE Finished top 3 in any other major senior level international competition  I see two here.  There is no additional sport specific guideline for fencing.  Another irrational AfD from the same NOM who apparently can't read.  Also nominating Lucia Lucarini and Camilla Mancini also medalists from the same competition.  I think this NOM should be blocked from further disruptions. Trackinfo (talk) 19:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - someone doesn't seem to understand that Universiade's are not senior competitions. Onel 5969  TT me 04:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I am not aware of Universiade's downgrading from a global competition of University students to a youth level meet. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to where that discussion has been held. Trackinfo (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sigh. University level competitions are not senior meets. Onel 5969  TT me 19:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sigh. You apparently do not have a decision to base that on. Trackinfo (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * delete No significant non-routine coverage to meet the GNG. As mentioned previously, the universiade is not the highest level of competition for fencers. The FIE doesn't consider it a major event and a world ranking of 50 is not usually considered enough to show notability. Even boxers, in a more widely known sport, need to be in the top 15 and top 10 judoka have been put up for deletion.  I mention these because they are fellow combat sports.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandals1 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Italy at the 2019 Summer Universiade I think Sandals1 makes good points. I do not see anything that convinces me that WP:NSPORT is met since the subject has never competed at the highest level.  I'm not seeing the coverage to show WP:GNG is met and it also looks like WP:BLP1E applies since all claimed notability stems from the one Universiade games.  Having said all that, I am willing to propose a redirect to the aforementioned article.  I just don't think an individual article is warranted at this time. Papaursa (talk) 00:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.