Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Raven

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 00:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Michele Raven
((''Extremely offensive reason for deletion deleted. I think the reason is "vanity."'' Kelly Martin 19:45, August 23, 2005 (UTC))) CrunkGurl88 07:11, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, since appears to be a bad faith VfD nomination. --Alan Au 07:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, much as I don't like the vfd, this is a nn page. Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination ref: I'm happy to consider this notable. Usrnme h8er 07:57, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad faith indeed, but this person is still nn.  (She does exist, so it's not hoax.)  Marblespire 08:13, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep new here but I think this should be kept, according to IMDB she has been in 54 movies and directed two more, she also gets 20,000+ google hits, is apparently Elegant Angels #1 star known as "Slutwoman" (LOL) and if Im to understand recent VfD debate correctly almost all porn-star pages are being kept, at least ones that are 10x less notable that this woman are. -ShadowStaller 08:19, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Notable enough. Delete CrunkGurl88. Cyclone49 09:28, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain. Sheesh, the oddest VfD request ever. Delete the Nominator! --Agamemnon2 09:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The question is, can you CSD a VfD as nonsense? Usrnme h8er 11:11, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's certainly a bad faith nomination, but at least one other editor in good faith is of the opinion that the article should be deleted. So it's probably best to just ignore the nomination and discuss as normal, on the merits of the article subject at hand. Uncle G 11:22:05, 2005-08-23 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as notable porn star. Can we list the nomination under BJAODN. Capitalistroadster 11:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand per Capitalistroadster. Nomination should go to BJAODN if possible. --GraemeL (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster --Apyule 13:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capalistroadster, with BJAODN for the nom. --Several Times 14:43, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Porn actors and directors are a dime a dozen. There is nothing notable about this person or of value in the article. Also, it is my understanding that the subject is a "hoodrat" who drives a "broke-down car." --Tysto 15:58, 2005 August 23 (UTC)
 * Keep article. BJAODN VFD nomination. Delete CrunkGurl88. -- Bobdoe (Talk) 16:32, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Bobdoe to the letter :) --Raistlin 17:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Full disclosure: this article was written by User:Wiffle0rz, an editor that I'm actively trying to sheepdog right now. I suspect that he's a kid, and it would surprise me not one bit to know that the VfD nominator is also User:Wiffle0rz. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as this is clearly a nonsense nomination. Would prefer not to BJAODN this VfD.  Hall Monitor 19:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Seemingly notable star. CanadianCaesar 23:10, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep - Who can forget her stellar performances in "Train My White Ass 6" and "Ultimate Strap-On Super Slam 9". We now return to our regular NPOV.  -Awyllie 05:18, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable porn star. Roodog2k 18:35, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.