Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Trancossi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Michele Trancossi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Potentially fails WP:NPROF. Google Scholar results not that good.  scope_creep Talk  17:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can only find one mention in reasonable RS. NickCT (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Article sounds impressive however the lack of online sources really doesn't help the cause here. His name doesn't pop up in New Scientist search results what so ever and that raises a red flag for me because any notable inventor or scientist normally has an article or two. Govvy (talk) 23:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no significant coverage from third-party sources that I have found. Based upon the original author's username and userpage, this appears to be WP:SPIP. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This looks like an autobiography.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references given are independent and my search didn't find coverage that I believe meets WP:GNG. The fact it appears to be an autobiography is not good, but that alone is not grounds for deletion.  I don't see evidence that WP:NPROF is met. Papaursa (talk) 20:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.