Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Deighton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Michelle Deighton
prod tag was removed by User:Badlydrawnjeff who commented that "reality contestants are inherently notable". This contestant lost on the show, then went on to do nothing to set herself apart from her peers. Less than 600 hits on Google. Mikeblas 03:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete reality cruft. Arbusto 04:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, reality show contestants are not inherently notable. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Reality show contestants are inherently non-notable.  Win something or do something outstanding, then come back. Resolute 04:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Zoe. JoshuaZ 06:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge/redirect Like the legs, face not so much. In any case, even the navbox only lists the season winners. ~ trialsanderrors 07:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Kf4bdy talk contribs 07:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 10:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete reality contestants are inherently vacuous, not notable. But close. Guy 15:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Badlydrawnjeff has (unsuccessfully) used the same argument to contest prev. prod/AfD nominations. (See Bre Scullark, Sarah Dankleman, Kari Schmidt and Kathy Hoxit for prev. discussions on the matter. All resulted in a Delete consensus.) Caknuck 19:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the show page. -- lucasbfr talk 21:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect --Wareq 07:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, noted reality contestant. Very well known, meets letter and spirit of WP:BIO.  no real reason given to delete. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Not notable, nor memorable, and would fail the 100 year test with decades to spare. Redirect to ANTM4 per plenty of precedent, or otherwise Delete. Ohconfucius 04:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.