Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Miscavige


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — Theopolisme ( talk )  03:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Michelle Miscavige

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not independently notable. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michelle_Miscavige&diff=545733670&oldid=545726956 Redirect] was reverted. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep subject is the topic of multiple independent reliable sources which span for several years of coverage.Coffeepusher (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Most of her notability derives from her husband but there is sufficient evidence of independent notability. Ducknish (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Search for "Shelly Miscavige" on Google, in Google Books, or in any large scale news archive and you will find far more coverage than is required by WP:BIO.  She is independently notable for being a high ranking Scientology member and a leader in the church until her unexplained disappearance in 2006.  Several reliable sources also say that she introduced Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.  Together, this makes her more notable than most of the people covered by WP:Biography.  Andrew327 06:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment since the original deletion through redirect, this article has been expanded by 9,720 bites and 10 new reliable sources have been added.Coffeepusher (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I asked the original poster if (s)he'd be willing to withdraw this AFD but my request was refused. Would this possibly be covered under speedy keep?  Andrew327 18:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Letting this run is actually better for you. Just saying. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 18:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.