Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Ronksley-Pavia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Michelle Ronksley-Pavia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. Could not find indepth coverage, article is rather promotional. LibStar (talk) 05:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Artists, Authors, Women, England,  and Australia. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is way out of date (see her | current bio), and while there are some new sources that mention her passing (| here and | here), on my search I did not find enough to meet WP:PROF and warrant me adding them to the page. Fails WP:PROF, WP:ANYBIO. Cabrils (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not finding enough in a BEFORE search that is about her to establish notability as an artist or professor. She is a lecturer in an important educational field (gifted education & special needs), however I don't think her citation scores/h-index is high enough in her field for her to pass WP:NACADEMIC. Her bio on the Griffith University website states she is "award-winning", but the only award mentioned there is ‘Best Research Paper’ international award from the K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education (Republic of China) which I don't think is a notable award. I found zero about her as a visual artist: no record of shows nor reviews of exhibitions, and no museum or national gallery collections. Therefore does not pass WP:NARTIST. What I have found are things she has published but no reviews, therefore it seems she doesn't seem meet WP:NAUTHOR either. The two main editors of the article are and  who are both SPAs which may indicate a COI (tho neither have been active since 2013). Her field of work and service is an important one, and she is obviously very good at what she does, however, she does not meet our notability criteria. If I'm wrong about this and others find SIGCOV in reliable sources, I may consider changing my !vote. Netherzone (talk) 17:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.