Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Seiler-Tucker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Michelle Seiler-Tucker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-promotional, largely sourced from primary sources and press releases. Does not appear notable. Trivialist (talk) 22:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

How can an article like Eileen P. Gunn exist but not Michelle Seiler-Tucker? Team 77 (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: If there are other articles you can find which don't meet the guidelines, take those to AfD too!  Nha Trang  Allons! 19:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: There sure are a lot of references, but they're blogs, press releases, casual mentions, quotes from the subject (which by the guideline can't be used to support the notability of the subject) and the subject's own website.  Nha Trang  Allons! 19:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to meet the inclusion requirements - there isn't enough independent coverage. - Bilby (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Same reasons as Nha Trang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentogoa (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Insufficient WP:RS that this passes WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.