Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Sorenson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Michelle Sorenson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be notable and contains little, if any, encyclopedic content. Jvr725 03:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just a story in a book. No evidence of real-world notability. Redddogg (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No real assertion of notability in the article, and I can't find anything to establish notability.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  03:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete = I did Google, Gnews, and Gscholar searches when I put this article up for PROD a couple of weeks ago and I found the same lack of sources that LinguistAtLarge did. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.