Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michi-chan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Michi-chan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. The article contains no sources and I could not find any Reliable Source coverage. From the article, it appears that none of their parody songs have been released commercially. BlueAzure (talk) 02:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Touring, awards, or releases on major labels: these are things that can show notability under WP:MUSIC. I don't see any of those here. EdJohnston (talk) 02:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertation of notability whatsoever per WP:MUSIC. Also note that the intro identifies the singer as being, the author's article. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No claims of notability, miles away from passing WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, unsourced article. —  Wen li  (reply here) 04:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:MUSIC and WP:COI.    Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Searching for references comes up empty, appears to be self-promotion. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 06:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.