Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michoel Schnitzler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No sources could be found to verify the article or demonstrate notability, which is particularly unacceptable for a WP:BLP. ~ mazca  talk 23:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Michoel Schnitzler

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP of a non-notable individual, per WP:MUSICBIO. Prod was contested, so bringing here for discussion. I agree with the original prods, as there is not "significant" reliable coverage; Google only shows a few reliable results, and Google News shows a good example of 2 hits that are "trivial" mentions.  Jamie ☆ S93  13:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The first 100-150 Ghits indicates that it will be difficult to meet WP:BAND. The deprodding editor seems to have confused this artist with a namesake chamber music artist - acting in good faith, but mistaken. Power.corrupts (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as the admin that PRODed it. لenna  vecia  17:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep due to notability as a artist in the Chassidic Jewish community. My challenge to this is that I haven't found any verifiable sources to this.  If no one else can that I'll toss my hat in with Delete.  Unfortunately but such is the way of the Wiki. Joe407 (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.