Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michonne Bourriague


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Michonne Bourriague

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:ENT. No notability as a model, only one minor role as an actress. Only source is IMDb.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 17:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. One might argue that any named role in the Star Wars films is inherently notable. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 19:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete While just one credited and well-covered role fails, if the asserted fanbase can be documented, she might then meet WP:ENT. But IF the article is properly sourced to meet WP:BLP, I might be able to then reconsider my delete opinion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Not In The Least Degree Weak Delete: One might argue that a so-called "named role" in a Star Wars film is inherently notable, but as it happens WP:ENTERTAINER makes no such presumption. That being said, the subject's appearance in SWI was an uncredited role without speaking lines, and that represents her sole film role of any kind.  If she's parlayed that into gigs on the convention circuit, more power to her, but I've been a featured panelist at SF cons myself, and I don't claim to be notable on that basis.  Complete WP:BIO failure.   Ravenswing  18:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 00:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:ENT: the claim of having a "fan base" seems to be the only leg this article stands on, and it's both unsourced and unlikely. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 08:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.