Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion, not even from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Michton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Was previously a proposed deletion on grounds of non-notability. I found a single 3rd party source which I have added to the article. Company are also featured in promotion materials produced by British Gas. I am currently undecided as to notability, so feel a discussion here is warranted. JulesH (talk) 20:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No opinion as nominator. (Just to clarify that my listing of this article is not intended as a !vote in favour of deletion) JulesH (talk) 20:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Topic meets WP:GNG:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  03:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Probably Keep Based on what I read online, the company was founded in 1991 and has 50 employees. The references cited are a bit light for Wikipedia's corporate notability guideline, but I think we should keep this article for the following reasons: (1) The company makes a product that is regionally-known; (2) There is no evidence that this article is an advertisement -- its just a decently-written stub describing a company; (3) WP:CHOCOLATE allows for Wikipedia articles for all good chocolatiers. Okay maybe I'm biased because I love chocolate.  NJ Wine (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.